Share this article
In workplace projects, failure is rarely sudden or dramatic. More often, underperformance emerges quietly, through small compromises, minor coordination lapses, and isolated decisions that accumulate over time. Industry research indicates that rework resulting from design gaps, coordination failures, and execution errors typically accounts for 5 to 10 percent of total project costs, with even greater exposure in complex workplace environments.
For senior leadership, these are not technical inconveniences; they represent lost time, diluted value, and delayed returns on capital already deployed.
A Case in Point
A post-occupancy analysis of a financial services workplace illustrates how this erosion occurs. The approved design centered on a shared collaboration hub linking multiple departments, supported by targeted acoustic treatment and integrated technology to encourage spontaneous interaction without disrupting adjacent focus areas.
By the time the project reached handover, that hub had been reduced to a narrow, echoing corridor, functionally intact but strategically hollow.
The breakdown did not stem from negligence or poor intent. Instead, it unfolded through a series of reasonable decisions made in isolation. A late-stage AV routing issue required adjustments to wall placements. To simplify MEP coordination, partitions were shifted. To offset the cost of rework, acoustic elements were value-engineered out. Each decision addressed a local constraint, yet no single party was accountable for protecting the original design logic.
Over time, the intent was not rejected. It was quietly dismantled.
What Gets Lost
This is the accountability gap. In fragmented delivery models, optimization occurs at the level of individual scopes rather than collective performance. Design teams hand off intent, contractors optimize for buildability and cost, and consultants resolve discipline-specific conflicts. What is lost is ownership of the outcome. Savings achieved in one area often trigger operational failures elsewhere, while responsibility for the overall experience becomes diluted across stakeholders.
Closing the Gap
Integrated delivery addresses this gap by eliminating the hand-off approach. The team that defines the design logic remains responsible for executing it. Decisions around acoustics, spatial adjacencies, circulation, and technology are evaluated not as isolated trade-offs but as interdependent elements of a single system.
When constraints arise, as they inevitably do, the question shifts from "who owns this scope?" to "how do we protect performance?" Execution becomes a continuation of design rather than a reinterpretation of it.
The true cost of lost accountability rarely appears on a construction balance sheet. It emerges after occupation, when spaces fail to support the behaviors they were designed for and costly retrofits become unavoidable. The most expensive project is not the one that overruns during construction, but the one that must be fixed while in use.
Closing the accountability gap is not about tighter control. It is about ensuring that intent survives delivery, and that organizations do not end up paying twice for the same space.
